How many of you use the 5 star rating system
Moderator: Gurus
How many of you use the 5 star rating system
Just curious.
I barely use it, maybe to bookmark a track that is really memorable.
But it's a far cry from have my entire database rated. I wonder how many people
do this. We are talking about many thoushands of tracks...
I barely use it, maybe to bookmark a track that is really memorable.
But it's a far cry from have my entire database rated. I wonder how many people
do this. We are talking about many thoushands of tracks...
I only rate my best tracks (4 stars or more), but even then, I notice that only my 5 stars tracks really are rated correctly.
I feel that music impression depends to much on personal mood and stuff like that, so I don't rate much as my ratings would change every time.
Cheers
Steegy
edit: fixed typo
I feel that music impression depends to much on personal mood and stuff like that, so I don't rate much as my ratings would change every time.
Cheers
Steegy
edit: fixed typo
Last edited by Steegy on Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Extensions: ExternalTools, ExtractFields, SongPreviewer, LinkedTracks, CleanImport, and some other scripts (Need Help with Addons > List of All Scripts).
I rate all my tracks default @ 2.5, then I rate up or down manually as the track plays, whenever I have the time/attention to do so.
There is also an auto-rate script currently in development in the script forum, to automatically increase/decrease rating by skips/plays.
There is also an auto-rate script currently in development in the script forum, to automatically increase/decrease rating by skips/plays.
New script: Last.FM Node Now with DJ Mode!
Last.fm + MediaMonkey = Scrobbler DJ!
Tag with MusicBrainz ~ Get Album Art!
Tweak the Monkey! ~ My Scripts Page
Last.fm + MediaMonkey = Scrobbler DJ!
Tag with MusicBrainz ~ Get Album Art!
Tweak the Monkey! ~ My Scripts Page
Every single track of my 10,000 tracks is rated, if nothing else for sending to my iPod.
I can only fit about 1,700-2,000 tracks in my iPod, so as far as most music goes, I'll only want to send the best to the iPod via a general play list of 4 stars or better. That sends about 1,500 to the iPod.
Then I start with various artists, and I don't care about a rating as much, so for the Beatles, I may make a playlist for the Beatles at 3 stars and above, not as picky. Same is true for Bruce Springsteen and other artists, where I am willing to dig a little deeper into the well.
For specific playlists, like schmultzy love music, I might duplicate some of the other stuff, but again, might want a 3 star song to get jiggy with my lady.
I find the star system be very very important in making playlists.
I can only fit about 1,700-2,000 tracks in my iPod, so as far as most music goes, I'll only want to send the best to the iPod via a general play list of 4 stars or better. That sends about 1,500 to the iPod.
Then I start with various artists, and I don't care about a rating as much, so for the Beatles, I may make a playlist for the Beatles at 3 stars and above, not as picky. Same is true for Bruce Springsteen and other artists, where I am willing to dig a little deeper into the well.
For specific playlists, like schmultzy love music, I might duplicate some of the other stuff, but again, might want a 3 star song to get jiggy with my lady.
I find the star system be very very important in making playlists.
Regards,
Scooter
Registered Lifetime Gold Licensee
Since 2006
Custom RAID Workstation > Focusrite I/O > 1g Cat6 Network > Adcom Preamp > Vandersteen Crossover > Adcom Power Amp > Vandersteen 3 Speakers > Vandersteen 2wq Subwoofer
Scooter
Registered Lifetime Gold Licensee
Since 2006
Custom RAID Workstation > Focusrite I/O > 1g Cat6 Network > Adcom Preamp > Vandersteen Crossover > Adcom Power Amp > Vandersteen 3 Speakers > Vandersteen 2wq Subwoofer
I'm in the process of rating all 32,000 of my tracks.
4 is my baseline, anything below that I don't like. I use the other classifications along with genre to help cater for varying moods or occasions.
I use an absolute bucket load of auto-playlists based on these ratings and criteria to seperate the good from the bad from the unrated.
This will take me years to do, but there is no better tool than MediaMonkey for the job, especially considering some of the scripts that have been developed for it is well.
With almost half of my 32,000 tracks rated taking nearly 3 years, it's a good thing I'm in no hurry.
4 is my baseline, anything below that I don't like. I use the other classifications along with genre to help cater for varying moods or occasions.
I use an absolute bucket load of auto-playlists based on these ratings and criteria to seperate the good from the bad from the unrated.
This will take me years to do, but there is no better tool than MediaMonkey for the job, especially considering some of the scripts that have been developed for it is well.
With almost half of my 32,000 tracks rated taking nearly 3 years, it's a good thing I'm in no hurry.
-
- Posts: 14163
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:57 am
- Location: (Texas)
- Contact:
i use it to keep track of what is getting played the most.
since i reset the playcounter every week,
it is nice to have the ratings keep tabs on the songs.
since i reset the playcounter every week,
it is nice to have the ratings keep tabs on the songs.
roving cowboy / keith hall. My skins http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... =9&t=16724 for some help check on Monkey's helpful messages at http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... 4008#44008 MY SYSTEMS.1.Jukebox WinXp pro sp 3 version 3.5 gigabyte mb. 281 GHz amd athlon x2 240 built by me.) 2.WinXP pro sp3, vers 2.5.5 and vers 3.5 backup storage, shuttle 32a mb,734 MHz amd athlon put together by me.) 3.Dell demension, winxp pro sp3, mm3.5 spare jukebox.) 4.WinXp pro sp3, vers 3.5, dad's computer bought from computer store. )5. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G Android ) 6. amd a8-5600 apu 3.60ghz mm version 4 windows 7 pro bought from computer store.
-
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:12 am
- Location: Loony left coast, USA.
It's never too late, just got the the files to edit -> unknown genre!
New script: Last.FM Node Now with DJ Mode!
Last.fm + MediaMonkey = Scrobbler DJ!
Tag with MusicBrainz ~ Get Album Art!
Tweak the Monkey! ~ My Scripts Page
Last.fm + MediaMonkey = Scrobbler DJ!
Tag with MusicBrainz ~ Get Album Art!
Tweak the Monkey! ~ My Scripts Page
I tend to rate whole albums. I'll listen to it, and if I like it I'll give all the tracks 4, pick a couple of favourites and give them 4.5 of 5. That kinda thing. Above half my tracks are rated at the moment, although a few more each day!
Download my scripts at my own MediaMonkey fansite.
All the code for my website and scripts is safely backed up immediately and for free using Dropbox.
All the code for my website and scripts is safely backed up immediately and for free using Dropbox.
I rate all my songs. I've been at it for more then a year.
1 star: pure crap or filler/interlude songs
2 stars: pretty crappy song
3 stars: not good, not bad
4: stars: pretty good
5: favorite songs
I generally listen to autoplaylists by genres and with a rating of 5 stars.
1 star: pure crap or filler/interlude songs
2 stars: pretty crappy song
3 stars: not good, not bad
4: stars: pretty good
5: favorite songs
I generally listen to autoplaylists by genres and with a rating of 5 stars.
Download MediaMonkey | License
Help: Knowledge Base | MediaMonkey for Windows 5 | MediaMonkey for Android
Lowlander (MediaMonkey user since 2003)
Help: Knowledge Base | MediaMonkey for Windows 5 | MediaMonkey for Android
Lowlander (MediaMonkey user since 2003)
-
- Posts: 1017
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 1:09 am
- Location: In a jungle down under
- Contact:
Like others here, I did not feel like manual ratings, however valuable it might be.
With the help of little bit of logic, I manage to put together an AutoRate system, available at http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... &start=113
The base of the system is simple. Tolerance for a song. If you like it, you tend to play it, if you do not, you tend to skip it if it plays.
Ideal solution if you have a collection that has received little or no attention in regards to ratings.
Worth I try. Plus a TTS Radio Announcer were added as a non-default option, if you're in a playful mood.
When time allow, I would like to put together a 'Catch-up' script based on a similar logic. To run once, and the whole collection will be rated. Then the current 'live' version will keep it up to date.
With the help of little bit of logic, I manage to put together an AutoRate system, available at http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... &start=113
The base of the system is simple. Tolerance for a song. If you like it, you tend to play it, if you do not, you tend to skip it if it plays.
Ideal solution if you have a collection that has received little or no attention in regards to ratings.
Worth I try. Plus a TTS Radio Announcer were added as a non-default option, if you're in a playful mood.
When time allow, I would like to put together a 'Catch-up' script based on a similar logic. To run once, and the whole collection will be rated. Then the current 'live' version will keep it up to date.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:54 pm
-
- Posts: 1017
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 1:09 am
- Location: In a jungle down under
- Contact:
Say you get a new album today, you may play it a bit more often than others this week. The AutoRateSongs will take note of this and rate it for you.
Playing 'catch-up' is a bit more of a puzzle, but it is in the works.
I have found with myself that there are songs that I would like to like, but I realize I do not... All up I'm quite happy with this cruel 'natures law' kind of logic..
Playing 'catch-up' is a bit more of a puzzle, but it is in the works.
I have found with myself that there are songs that I would like to like, but I realize I do not... All up I'm quite happy with this cruel 'natures law' kind of logic..
Last edited by DiddeLeeDoo on Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:09 am, edited 1 time in total.