This one has been bugging me from when I first started using MM.
In the Year node, each decade is listed in the following fashion: "1990's", "2000's", "2010's". There should NOT be an apostrophe in the label - it's "2010s". It is plural usage and there is no possession.
I'm not sure if it ever will get changed but I feel better now.
Also Not Exactl A Bug... But ! [#11143]
Moderator: Gurus
Re: Also Not Exactl A Bug... But !
Amen to that. I know most would find it trivial but it irritates me a great deal to see those superfluous apostrophes. How can these labels be edited?
Re: Also Not Exactl A Bug... But !
Download MediaMonkey | License
Help: Knowledge Base | MediaMonkey for Windows 5 | MediaMonkey for Android
Lowlander (MediaMonkey user since 2003)
Help: Knowledge Base | MediaMonkey for Windows 5 | MediaMonkey for Android
Lowlander (MediaMonkey user since 2003)
Re: Also Not Exactl A Bug... But ! [#11143]
I'm curious, from point Non native English speaker 1990s looks logical but what about 90's and '90s?
Best regards,
Peke
MediaMonkey Team lead QA/Tech Support guru
Admin of Free MediaMonkey addon Site HappyMonkeying
How to attach PICTURE/SCREENSHOTS to forum posts
Peke
MediaMonkey Team lead QA/Tech Support guru
Admin of Free MediaMonkey addon Site HappyMonkeying
How to attach PICTURE/SCREENSHOTS to forum posts
Re: Also Not Exactl A Bug... But ! [#11143]
It's always been wrote that way as far as I can remember seeing it on numbers, looks strange to not have the ' in the 1990's typing
Re: Also Not Exactl A Bug... But ! [#11143]
90's is the same error as in the original post.
'90s is correct as long as you are not writing formally. The apostrophe in this case denotes that characters have been excluded to shorten the word.
'90s is correct as long as you are not writing formally. The apostrophe in this case denotes that characters have been excluded to shorten the word.
Re: Also Not Exactl A Bug... But ! [#11143]
" '90s " is correct because it's an abbreviation. " 90's " is unnecessary apostrophe wastage. The apostrophe is serving no function at all there.Peke wrote:I'm curious, from point Non native English speaker 1990s looks logical but what about 90's and '90s?