by Ludek » Mon Mar 04, 2013 10:19 am
I use 1626 portable on SSD drive too and haven't noticed any slowdowns/sluggish. MM starts in 2 seconds and all is fast (same as with the regural version).
I don't see a reason for a performance regression in 1626. Are you saying this is not issue for you with the previous builds?
How big is your DB ?
I use 1626 portable on SSD drive too and haven't noticed any slowdowns/sluggish. MM starts in 2 seconds and all is fast (same as with the regural version).
I don't see a reason for a performance regression in 1626. Are you saying this is not issue for you with the previous builds?
How big is your DB ?