Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post a reply

Visual Confirmation

To prevent automated access and spam, you are required to confirm that you are human. Please place a check mark next to all images of monkeys or apes. If you cannot see any images, please contact the Board Administrator.

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :-? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Re: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by Peke » Fri Aug 25, 2017 9:23 pm

xbroski wrote:I tried both faststone and hypersnap, and i can say hypersnap serves me better.
At least now I do not sound like marketing guy that wonts to sell you something ;)

Re: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by xbroski » Fri Aug 25, 2017 2:30 am

I tried both faststone and hypersnap, and i can say hypersnap serves me better.

Re: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by Peke » Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:57 am

It doesn't record video, but it contain basic image editor, supports layouts. Huh, was long time ago when I bought it. Unfortunately from my personal experience every good application is expensive. Few examples, VueScan https://www.hamrick.com/reg.html , PrimalScript https://store.sapien.com/p-338-primalscript-2017.aspx or The BAT! https://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/ with AntiSpamSniper http://www.antispamsniper.com/ that for me they repaid their price at least hundred of times.

Re: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by MMFrLife » Mon Jul 31, 2017 12:20 pm

GeraldB, huge thanks!!
That's a shame. I really love the small utility-like size of it, combined with the ability to record.

Ok Peke, you got my attention with Hypersnap :wink:
I downloaded it, but only tried for a few moments. I'll try to get back to it to test more.
Does it do screen record? I'll have to look deeper at it.

It's very interesting with a lot of features.
The price is a bit steep at $40. I was hoping for something around $20 or less. 8)

Re: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by Peke » Sun Jul 30, 2017 10:04 pm

For Me HyperSnap was worth my money.

Re: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by GeraldB » Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:04 pm

Sent email. No response so far, but will post here if I get something. Maybe the discontinuance of the free version is a sign that we should switch to HyperSnap.

Re: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by Peke » Thu Jul 27, 2017 12:17 pm

I switched to Hypersnap the the same issue.

Re: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by MMFrLife » Mon Jul 24, 2017 8:11 am

Ok, thanks for confirmation!
Windows 7 here, too.

I have used capture progs before that don't do that. I would be willing to get the pay version (free version is discontinued) if it had the option to capture only the page itself.
My problem is I can't get throught to their support. I've emailed them several times, and nothing. I've checked my spam folder every time, and nothing. :roll:
I'm wondering if their support is either dead or under construction. Can you do me a favor and email them with a simple/just curious natured question about
the same issue, just to see if they reply? If you don't feel comfortable doing that, no worries.

Re: Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by GeraldB » Sun Jul 23, 2017 10:07 pm

I have Windows 7 and the free version of FastStone. It works the same for me as you describe. Copies everything on the screen when scrolling, including frames. In addition the scroll function does not work well for me; the resulting copy has horizontal gaps and/or lines in it. However it works great for copying selected areas of the screen so I've used it often and for several years.

Anyone use "FastStone Capture"?

Post by MMFrLife » Wed May 31, 2017 3:26 pm

If so, when you use the scrolling page capture feature does it capture "only" the page and not the web browser frame with it?
When I use it, it always captures the browser in addition.

Top